The Ledger
Campaign finance dispatches. Data-driven. Non-partisan.
$1.6 Billion Is Pouring Into 500 Races — Here's Where It's Going
$1.63B3,662 candidates are chasing 500 seats. Texas, Illinois, and New York are leading the money race — and it's not even close.
Where the Money Is
Senate races account for $516 million across just 41 seats — an average of $12.6M per race. House races total $1.1 billion across 459 districts, but the money is far from evenly distributed.
The top 5 states by funding: Texas ($185M), Illinois ($135M), New York ($118M), California ($118M), and Georgia ($83M). Together, these five states account for nearly 40% of all election spending.
The Biggest Races
The Texas Senate race leads at $61.9M with 34 candidates in the field. Georgia Senate follows at $59.1M, and Illinois Senate at $53.6M. These three races alone represent over 10% of all 2026 election funding.
The money is an early indicator of where both parties see opportunity — and where outside groups are placing their bets.
The Grassroots Gap: Where Small Donors Are — and Aren't
70.6%Some candidates raise millions from small donors. Others rely almost entirely on PACs and big checks. The difference tells you everything.
The Small-Donor Champions
- Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY): 70.6% small-donor on $23.7M raised
- Joshua Weil (FL): 72.5% on $15.9M
- Graham Platner (ME): 69.7% on $7.9M
- James Talarico (TX): 58.8% on $20.7M
- Jon Ossoff (GA): 55.4% on $43.2M — the cycle's biggest fundraiser
The Big-Money Players
On the other end: Raja Krishnamoorthi (IL) has raised $30.5M but just 1.9% from small donors. John Fleming (LA) self-funded $8.1M of his $8.7M total — 0.4% from small donors. Steve Scalise (LA): 2.3% small-donor on $7.8M.
The gap matters. Small-donor candidates need broad public support to stay funded. Big-check candidates answer to a much smaller room.
24 Races Where Outside Money Is Deciding the Outcome
$125.9M$125.9 million in independent expenditures. 24 competitive races. Some candidates are being outspent by groups they've never met.
The Battlegrounds
Cook Political Report and IE intensity data flag 24 races as truly competitive. The most contested:
- Illinois 7th District: $12.1M total funding
- Alabama Senate: $10.5M
- North Carolina 1st: $9.8M (Lean R)
- Nevada 3rd: $8.2M (Lean D)
- Virginia 7th: $7.9M (Lean D)
Why It Matters
When outside groups can flood a district with millions in ads, the candidate's own fundraising becomes secondary. In several of these races, Super PAC spending exceeds what the candidates themselves have raised. That's not influence — it's control.
10 Candidates Exposed: $47M of Their Own Money on the Line
$47.2MThey can't be bought — because they're buying it themselves. Meet the millionaires bankrolling their own campaigns.
The Biggest Bets
- John Fleming (R-LA Senate): $8.1M self-funded of $8.7M total — 93% his own money
- Peter Chatzky (D-NY House): $5.8M of $6.1M — 95% self-funded
- David Trone (D-MD House): $5.4M of $6.0M — 90% self-funded
- Mark Lynch (R-SC Senate): $5.0M of $5.6M — 89% self-funded
- Anthony Constantino (R-NY House): $5.0M of $5.0M — 100% self-funded
The Trade-Off
Self-funders can't be influenced by donors — but they also skip the accountability that comes with building a donor base. When you don't need anyone's money, you don't need anyone's approval. That independence is either a feature or a bug, depending on who wins.